I do not understand the HATRED for mirrorless cameras on this forum.

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
Mellowmark
Contributing MemberPosts: 607Gear list
Like?
Re: I do not understand the HATRED for mirrorless cameras on this forum.
In reply to Just another Canon shooter, 8 months ago

Just another Canon shooter wrote:

Yes.

14-35/2 (not even wide enough): $2,300, 900g. Canon 24-70/4 IS: $800 on Adorama right now, 600g, 3cm shorter.

35-100/2: $2,500, 1.65kg. Canon 70-200/4 IS: $1,200 right now, 760g (!), 3cm thinner and 4cm shorter.

Those are not m43 lenses!   So you have totally ignored my comparison using m43 lenses and made your own one with non m43 lenses?

And an f2.8 lens is an f2.8 lens in terms of exposure. As regards DOF F2.0 or F2.8 on m43 does not equal f5.6 on APS-C.   I use both a m43 camera and an APS-C dslr - the main advantage of the former is the smaller size and weight while for some situations a dslr is a better choice - hence I have both. If I thought m43 did everything I wanted I would only use m43, but it doesn't - so I don't. ¬†Depth of field difference between APS-C and m43 is fairly small and image quality is also fairly similar. If narrower depth of field is required and budget allows then that is what full frame is for. I don't see either m43 or APS-C as 'better' - both have their disadvantages and advantages.

 Mellowmark's gear list:Mellowmark's gear list
Sony RX100
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow