The 'discriminatory-nature' of capture-date stipulations!

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
billythek
Senior MemberPosts: 3,863
Like?
Re: The 'discriminatory-nature' of capture-date stipulations!
In reply to tasad, 7 months ago

What game are you playing here ?

You have cheated on the date taken rule in this challenge :

http://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=590637

http://www.dpreview.com/members/2633223631/galleries

In the challenge , entries should be taken after 19th February , 2012 . Your entry was "taken " on 25th February , 2012 :

...

... but your Flickr account shows , that it was taken on 10th June , 2011 :

http://www.flickr.com/photos/notts_photos/5817446473/in/photostream/

...

Recently you have opened another account :

http://www.dpreview.com/members/5847064165/overview

... and entered the image in to the challenge with the rule : "  No pictures entered in previous challenges "

http://www.dpreview.com/challenges/Entry.aspx?ID=815180

...

LOL, and he obviously came here and started this thread to rub our noses in it. Well, here is one to show to Simon.
--
- Bill

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
yupNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow