Thom Hogan's review of the A7/A7r

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
stuntmonkey
Senior MemberPosts: 2,658
Like?
Re: I don't think he is wrong, exactly
In reply to tex, 6 months ago

tex wrote:

So it is here: comparisons against DSLR's are not entirely appropriate, any more than comparing them to m43 format. The difficulty is, there really isn't a populated object class for these cameras----there isn't anything to compare them to. Right now they are black swans.

It's not a comparison to the DSLR, it's a commentary about the comparison to the DSLR. When Gizmodo runs articles titles like "Why the DSLR is Dead" etc etc, then the current state of the discussion is fair game. An experienced shooter knows the difference, but you can't talk about "serious mirrorless" without running into "Is it as good as DSLR?"... even if that question has less meaning than it seems that it does.

Or to put it another way, if Canon/Nikon are 80% of the market (in NA at least) then why shouldn't the A7/A7r be compared to DSLR's. As a sales effort, if it doesn't have something more to give than what people already know, then why should it exist? E.G., how can one talk about the benefits of the A7r without spelling out exactly how it's better than a D800? Hence, the comparisons are unavoidable and valid, even if they can lead the conversation astray sometimes.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow