Thom Hogan's review of the A7/A7r

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
Erik Magnuson
Forum ProPosts: 11,722Gear list
Like?
Re: Thom Hogan's review of the A7/A7r
In reply to Tim Devine, 4 months ago

Tim Devine wrote:

So the net of this conversation is that DxO Analyzer is flawed in that it doesn't mimic what might be realistic if someone used an actual raw converter.

Or that it's definition of DR is not precisely what a photographer would consider useful DR.   Or it's possible that Thom was using RawDigger's analysis of A7 raw files which may define DR using different quality thresholds than DxO.

I will go so far as to say that Thom believes that based on his experience with the carmeras and ACR, that ISO 200 is the optimal ISO.

Given so many potential variables (of which DR is only one), "optimal" is inherently subjective.  It would be useful if Thom elaborated why he thinks ISO 200 is optimal.

-- hide signature --

Erik

 Erik Magnuson's gear list:Erik Magnuson's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 450D Sigma SD10 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Nikon D3200 +24 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow