There is no magical size/weight advantage

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
Ross
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,749Gear list
Like?
Re: Leica and light bags.
In reply to Sante Patate, 5 months ago

Sante Patate wrote:

samfan wrote:

At the end what matters is what ends up in your bag. And if shorter FD gives you a 10% size and weight reduction, the smaller lens elements 20%, lighter electronics 20% and collapsibility 20%, then it all adds up to a very nice reduction right there. Leica afficionados who value the size of their system against DSLRs don't care they're comparing it to AF VR N IS OS VS or whatever lenses, they want to have a light camera bag.

It's the fact that Leica lenses are $2.5K to $6K each that keeps the bag light ;-). The fact that the longest lens Leica make in M mount is 135mm helps as well.

Leica users have light bags because they have made a choice (or can't afford not) to photograph with one or two prime lenses. A similar choice is open to everybody, whatever system they use. It is the perceived need to maintain coverage of a huge focal range that keeps the bag heavy, whatever tinkering around the edges is done.

I can load my Leica bag up easily with the accumulation of 40 years, but I seldom do prefering to use my pockets. It is hard to make generalizations that can stick.

-- hide signature --

Bob

 Ross's gear list:Ross's gear list
Nikon 1 V2
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow