Definition of bokeh, simply gibberish?

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
carlk
Forum ProPosts: 15,790Gear list
Like?
Re: In focus area: IQ. >> Out of focus area: Bokeh.
In reply to guitarjeff, 4 months ago

guitarjeff wrote:

carlk wrote:

You say IQ of the picture is good/bad and Bokeh of the picture is good/bad. Simple as that.

I can live with that. The bokeh (blur is pleasing or not to individuals, that's subjective. the blurs existence in the photo is not subjective, that's a real thing. And if bokeh is to be a real thing, then the only thing it can be beyond subjective is the blur. Simple as that. Made even shorter, --there is no REAL part of bokeh, beyond subjective, OTHER THAN BLUR.

Exactly.  It's the same as you can't have an objective or quantitative definition of IQ other than perhaps sharpness.

 carlk's gear list:carlk's gear list
Canon EOS 50D Canon EOS 7D Nikon D800E Fujifilm X-E1 Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow