Definition of bokeh, simply gibberish?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
guitarjeff
Contributing MemberPosts: 874
Like?
Re: Definition of bokeh, simply gibberish?
In reply to slimandy, 6 months ago

slimandy wrote:

darngooddesign wrote:

Bokeh is absolutely definable as the out of focus areas caused by depth of field.

No it isn't. It is the quality of the blur.

Then give us the parameters of that thing, if you can't, then it is subjective, which isn't real.  If bokeh is real, then it is definable, understand?  A quality is an aspect of something definable.  Saying a real thing is THE QUALITY is ABSOLUTE GIBBERISH and meaningless.

You can have more or less, which is user controlled.

No, you can have more or less blur but not more or less bokeh,

Define it then, so we can all agree what bokeh actually is, since you are saying it is REAL.  If you CAN'T define it, it isn't real.  What is the only REAL thing in the photo you can define?  YOU GOT IT, BLUR.  How you get it, using distance and all that is meaningless.  Subject distance alters dof, so the blur is still thaqt which is not in the dof, it matters not how you got the depth of field, distance, aperture, whatever, it's still blur due to dof.

and the amount of blur is not just governed by depth of field. A longer lens will give more blur for the same framing and same depth of field.

Meaningless.  Whatever is out of focus and not be subject movement or camera shake, or focus errors is blur because of the dof.

You can have good and bad, which is a characteristic of the lens. For example, I think this is bad bokeh, like someone blurred an area and then ran a really harsh sharpness filter in photoshop. While good/bad is subjective if most people consider the quality of bokeh from this lens to be unpleasant you can then objectively say that the lens provides bad bokeh.

I agree this is bad, but it is subjective and some people might like it.

When people say a photo has nice bokeh, they are referring to a combination of how much and how good the quality of the bokeh is to them.

They are not quite accurate then. They should only be referring aesthetic quality of the blur. Shallower DoF may affect the quality of the bokeh by giving more blur but so will other factors such as narrow field of view.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/bokeh

-- hide signature --

www.andrewsandersphotography.co.uk

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow