This shot is what convinced me to shoot in RAW (RX10)

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
Chris59
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,778Gear list
Like?
Re: THE TRUTH
In reply to sybersitizen, 6 months ago

sybersitizen wrote:

Chris59 wrote:

sybersitizen wrote:

Chris59 wrote:
... Try removing chromatic aberrations or distortion from a JPEG.

That is perfectly easy to do in post processing, and is even becoming widely supported in-camera. You picked a bad example if you want to highlight drawbacks of shooting JPEGs.

Wrong. JPEGs from in camera have the chromatic aberrations and distortion "removed" from the RAW data before the data is converted into a JPEG.

So what?

Also, removing distortion and other aberrations from a JPEG may be "easy" but it introduces far more digital artefacts than doing it from RAW.

You're grasping at straws. The process works, though you implied it doesn't.

Read the post again.  I'm talking about going over old files and removing the aberrations.  If you do it with a JPEG not only is the process less successful image quality wise, saving a JPEG after the process brings an inevitable further degradation to the image.  This won't happen with RAW.

The "implication" wasn't that the process wouldn't work but that the process is a poor substitute.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow