There is no magical size/weight advantage

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
clark321
Regular MemberPosts: 268Gear list
Like?
Re: There is no magical …
In reply to myzel, 8 months ago

myzel wrote:

And just in case: A CX 70-300 isn't going to be that much smaller than a FX 70-300 - in the worst case it could be bigger. But it would be smaller than a 189-810 if you don't mind the larger DoF

This equivalency of 189-810 depends entirely on pixel density. If the full frame camera has the same pixel density as the N1 then the objects seen in the images from both cameras using a 70-300 lens will be the same size when viewed at 100%.

 clark321's gear list:clark321's gear list
Canon EOS 600D Nikon 1 V1 A3000 Sigma 30mm F2.8 DN Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow