There is no magical size/weight advantage

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
Sante Patate
Senior MemberPosts: 3,441
Like?
Leica and light bags.
In reply to samfan, 4 months ago

samfan wrote:

At the end what matters is what ends up in your bag. And if shorter FD gives you a 10% size and weight reduction, the smaller lens elements 20%, lighter electronics 20% and collapsibility 20%, then it all adds up to a very nice reduction right there. Leica afficionados who value the size of their system against DSLRs don't care they're comparing it to AF VR N IS OS VS or whatever lenses, they want to have a light camera bag.

It's the fact that Leica lenses are $2.5K to $6K each that keeps the bag light ;-).  The fact that the longest lens Leica make in M mount is 135mm helps as well.

Leica users have light bags because they have made a choice (or can't afford not) to photograph with one or two prime lenses.  A similar choice is open to everybody, whatever system they use.  It is the perceived need to maintain coverage of a huge focal range that keeps the bag heavy, whatever tinkering around the edges is done.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow