There is no magical size/weight advantage

Started Mar 5, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
olyflyer
olyflyer Forum Pro • Posts: 23,902
Re: Why do keep trolling the N1 forum? (Compare 10-100 & 18-200 vas 28-300)
2

jjoyce wrote:

IVN wrote:

frank-in-toronto wrote:

maybe i'm slow, but the 1 series lenses sure look smaller to me. much smaller.

Which for example?

The majority here got the N1 during the fire sales and found that these cameras are a lot better than the forums and web would make you believe.

Of course. As a matter of fact, I bought the V1 dual zoom kit before any fire sales ever been dreamed about and I still liked it and would do it again because I like it, but that was not the point.

Go compare the sizes of these three lenses, Nikon N1 New 10-100, DX18-200 and FX28-300 and report back... (All around 3.5-5.6)

Are they similar in any other parameter then the aperture size?

100/5.6 = 17.86

200/5.6 = 35.71

300/5.6 = 53.57

...so, let me guess...  without checking the actual facts that the 28-300 is the fattest, followed by the 18-200 and the smallest is the 10-100.

Don't you really have a clue why that is?

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
(unknown member)
IVN
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
(unknown member)
IVN
(unknown member)
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
tko
tko
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
IVN
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow