Potential dead horse: how bad is FF's deep DoF disadvantage?

Started Mar 5, 2014 | Discussions thread
rhlpetrus
Forum ProPosts: 23,760Gear list
Like?
Equivalence is the dead horse IMO
In reply to sportyaccordy, Mar 5, 2014

Except for FL translation, most other aspects of equivalence are irrelevant for most people, so larger means better, generally, in IQ aspects. Why is more DoF better than less Dof? Ask a wedding or a sports photog and they will tell you that shallow DoF is required for their business. Many PJs also like to isolate politicians and personalities, so events shooters will also like less DoF. Many landscapers, otoh, will like more DoF.

People with brand/format agendas are the ones that like to bring these "equivalence" findings to the fore.

-- hide signature --

Renato.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhlpedrosa/
OnExposure member
http://www.onexposure.net/
Good shooting and good luck
(after Ed Murrow)

 rhlpetrus's gear list:rhlpetrus's gear list
Leica D-Lux (Typ 109) Nikon D7000 Nikon 1 V1 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF Nikon AF Nikkor 35mm f/2D +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ZeroNew
(unknown member)
DustNew
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow