Potential dead horse: how bad is FF's deep DoF disadvantage?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
enemjii
Senior MemberPosts: 1,598Gear list
Like?
Re: Potential dead horse: how bad is FF's deep DoF disadvantage?
In reply to sportyaccordy, 9 months ago

sportyaccordy wrote:

Martin.au wrote:

There have been a few tests comparing this.

One I remember, current M4/3 sensor (E-PL5 IIRC) vs D800 at ISO1600/6400 - D800 was obviously noisier (At the full picture level, not at 100%, where it's obviously going to be noisier).

However, I would expect the D4 to be essentially identical to the E-PL5 under those circumstances.

I'm afraid I don't have time to find links right now.

Thinking about it more, the high ISO situations are not really relevant IMO. I'm trying to think of situations where you'd be shooting at a high ISO, but need both deep DoF AND a fast shutter speed.

Shooting shooting stars might qualify

 enemjii's gear list:enemjii's gear list
Sony SLT-A65 Sony a77 II Sony DT 55-300mm F4.5-5.6 SAM Sony DT 35mm F1.8 SAM Sigma 85mm F1.4 EX DG HSM +6 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ZeroNew
(unknown member)
DustNew
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow