Potential dead horse: how bad is FF's deep DoF disadvantage?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
Great Bustard
Forum ProPosts: 23,633
Like?
Let's put some photos and numbers to this.
In reply to Karaya, 6 months ago

Karaya wrote:

I was only attempting to point out that the supposed FF advantage in narrow DOF can be a double edged sword. There are instances when a photographer will want more DOF and compared to 4/3 will have to stop down two stops, with a given shutter speed this will necessitate raising the ISO two stops for the FF camera vis a vis the 4/3 camera. Whether current FF cameras will have a 2 stop advantage over 4/3 (or, rather m4/3) at a given ISO is open to debate.

Here are some interesting comparisons in terms of the noise differential between modern mFT and modern FF:

Based on pixel count: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53148569

Based on ISO setting: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/53170596

Smaller sensor cameras have the potential to close the gap with FF given lenses that are fast and sharp enough for the task. This is a real challenge to the optical engineers, no doubt, but is that not how 35mm film became the dominant format in competition with larger formats?

Consider Lenstip's review of the 75 / 1.8 on an EPL1 (16 MP mFT) and the 135 / 2L on a 1Ds3 (21 MP FF) or the 12-40 / 2.8 on an EPL1 vs the 24-70 / 2.8L II on a 1Ds3. Keeping in mind that we have to multiply lp/mm measurements by 26 and 48, respectively, for the mFT and FF measurements to get lw/ph, it does not appear that any gap is being closed by mFT on FF.

Indeed, perhaps a more "appropriate" comparison would be the 12-40 / 2.8 on an EPL1 vs the Sigma 24-105 / 4 OS on the 1Ds3.  Once again, we don't see any gaps being closed by mFT lenses.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ZeroNew
(unknown member)
DustNew
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow