Potential dead horse: how bad is FF's deep DoF disadvantage?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
Erik Magnuson
Forum ProPosts: 12,055Gear list
Like?
Re: Here is some sample shots.
In reply to Karaya, 6 months ago

Karaya wrote:

Given a really fast and sharp 4/3 lens, like the voigtlander 45 f.95 this shot could have been done with a 4/3 camera at F 1, 1/125 and ISO 100.

Only if the Voigtlander was sufficiently sharp at f/1. It's not. Lenstip.com: "It is clear that in the frame centre, at the maximum relative aperture, the image is still not fully useful. In order to improve it you have to stop down the lens near f/1.2. By f/1.4 the image quality can be already described as good and from f/2.0 upwards you deal with an excellent resolution level."

On Lentip's test, the Voigtlander does resolve about the same in lp/mm as the Canon 85mm at f/2. The problem is that a Canon FF has almost 2x the mm!

So, given really fast primes that are sharp wide open

Alas, that's not a given for really fast primes.

-- hide signature --

Erik

 Erik Magnuson's gear list:Erik Magnuson's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 450D Sigma SD10 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Nikon D3200 +28 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ZeroNew
(unknown member)
DustNew
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow