Potential dead horse: how bad is FF's deep DoF disadvantage?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
Erik Magnuson
Forum ProPosts: 12,103Gear list
Like?
Re: Potential dead horse: how bad is FF's deep DoF disadvantage?
In reply to GeraldW, 9 months ago

GeraldW wrote:

Back when I started this hobby in 1955; a lot more was being written about how to increase DOF, than there was about limiting it.

Films were slow and precision focus aids were relatively expensive.

Then, sometime in the 80's something called selective focus came into vogue.

It always depended on what you shot:  if the situation involves isolating a subject against a busy background (i.e. sports, outdoor fashion or portraiture, etc.) then shallow DOF makes a difference.  It's also about what's practical or affordable: how well could you have even used a 135mm f/2 lens in 1955?

-- hide signature --

Erik

 Erik Magnuson's gear list:Erik Magnuson's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 450D Sigma SD10 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Nikon D3200 +28 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ZeroNew
(unknown member)
DustNew
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow