There is no magical size/weight advantage

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
MattZisk
Contributing MemberPosts: 633
Like?
Re: There is no magical size/weight advantage
In reply to IVN, 6 months ago

Thanks, IVN. I loaded the blog page linked on Nikon rumors in Chrome and translated it (see HERE). There is an example provided that includes size and (if I am reading it correctly) suggests this example lens would be about 9-10 inches in length, which is about double the length of the current Nikon 70-300. The blog page reads:

  • Patent Publication No. 2013-210475
    • Publication date 2013.10.10
    • Filing date 2012.3.30
  • Example 1
    • Focal length f = 72.10-135.70-291.00mm
    • Fno. 4.13-4.5-5.77
    • Angle of view 2ω = 13.0-6.9-3.2 °
    • Image height Y = 8.19mm
    • 229.4-235.8-234.5mm in total length
    • 20 pieces of 13-group lens configuration
    • Six ED glass
    • Three fluorite

I pulled a copy of the patent application (unfortunately, it appears to have been published only in Japan and I don't read Japanese) and note that there appear from the tables to be other examples, one of which seems from its dimensions to be collapsible, and that they show it in a figure mounted to an SLR, not a MILC (I don't read much into this).

My bottom line: it's speculative that it's the lens that's speculated to be in development.  As this is speculation added to speculation, I think all bets are off and it will pay to see what (if any) facts emerge.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow