Is image stabilization really the stuff?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
gkstar
Regular MemberPosts: 247Gear list
Like?
Re: re: image stabilization? pretty useless for anything that moves (n/t)
In reply to cosmonaut, 7 months ago

cosmonaut wrote:

The only place I can recall being a tripod was not allowed was a museum and I had enough light at 6400 ISO at the time. I found the IS on the E-M1 so unreliable I had to take multiple shots to ensure a crisp image. What good is it if it can't be depended on? I was getting about 75% keepers. My previous Olympus cameras done way better.

But I think sooner or later high ISO quality is going to be so good IS will almost become a useless feature.

-- hide signature --

www.gregmccary.com

Very likely, though IS will remain a must when shooting video. Perhaps this is what you meant when you said almost

 gkstar's gear list:gkstar's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-7 Sony a6000 Sony E 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 OSS Sony E 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS LE Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow