Is image stabilization really the stuff?

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
EinsteinsGhost
Forum ProPosts: 11,977Gear list
Like?
Re: Is image stabilization really the stuff?
In reply to cosmonaut, 9 months ago

My A-mount body has IBIS and my E-mount body relies on optical stabilization (I have one E-mount and one A-mount lens with optical stabilization). I can do without it.

The one lens I do use with optical stabilization is E 35/1.8. But my issue has to do with Sony falling in love with 1/60s for minimum shutter speed. It is faster than the minimum to worry about OSS with 35mm lens, but I would rather have faster shutter speed especially with longer lenses... an idea better implemented in a55: the minimum shutter speed that the camera tries to maintain is 1/equiv FL. So, a 35mm will get 1/60s, 50mm gets 1/80s, 70mm gets 1/125s, 135mm gets 1/250s...

And the ability to set minimum shutter speed should be there with Auto ISO. Stabilization? I am okay with it for casual snapshots but pretty much anything that moves deserves better.

 EinsteinsGhost's gear list:EinsteinsGhost's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F828 Sony SLT-A55 Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Sony 135mm F2.8 (T4.5) STF +12 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow