More pixels?

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
Forum ProPosts: 15,347Gear list
I agree
In reply to TOF guy, 10 months ago

The vast majority of images are never printed. Most people don't own computers with enough resolution to display a D2H shot. So, we have lots of wasted pixels already. The few people who actually print large often fool themselves into thinking they need 300 or more pixels per inch, when they can't see that detail if they actually look at the whole image (not looking one inch at a time).

All that is left is marketing. They feel they HAVE to have the highest pixel count in a DSLR. Therefore they will buy it. But those people are getting fewer and fewer with each jump in pixels.

TOF guy wrote:

The rest is more about marketing than anything else.

To answer your question expect the MP race to go on for nothing else than marketing reasons.

-- hide signature --

Thierry - posted as regular forum member

-- hide signature --

Cycle tracks will abound in Utopia. --H.G. Wells

 bikinchris's gear list:bikinchris's gear list
Nikon D2H Nikon D3 Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D ED-IF Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-70mm f/2.8 ED-IF Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-400mm f/4G ED-IF VR +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow