Why is the 42.5 F/1.2 $1600 when the Fuji 56mm F/1.2 is only $1000?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
Moti
Veteran MemberPosts: 5,488
Like?
Re: You get less for more.
In reply to Sergey_Green, 7 months ago

Sergey_Green wrote:

BeaverTerror wrote:

..

I'm contemplating keeping the 100-300mm and one M43 body, selling all my other M43 gear, and moving to Fuji. Can anyone offer a compelling reason for why I shouldn't switch?

If you are after fast primes like this, the smallest sensor is certainly the wrong direction to look at. Not only 42.5 is more expensive, it is also slightly bigger and heavier, so what's the gain then?

The gain is all your neighbours and friends dying from jealousy once you tell them what what you bought. The performance and photos quality if at all, Are completely unimportant.

Moti

-- hide signature --
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Meh.New
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow