This shot is what convinced me to shoot in RAW (RX10)

Started 4 months ago | Discussions thread
nannyg
Regular MemberPosts: 225
Like?
Re: JPGs are better than most suppose...
In reply to sybersitizen, 4 months ago

sybersitizen wrote:

aaanouel wrote:

nannyg wrote:
... because you can't really PP a JPEG,

Really? look at the posted image and tell me if it can't be done...

aaanouel, I'm pretty sure nannyg was employing sarcasm and humor in his post, and he knows that JPEGs can be manipulated quite a bit if desired.

Yes, that is correct.

I've had this discussion a number of times - enough that I assumed you would get it. My fault that you didn't. I used some of the common pro-RAW lingo in my little attempt at humor. I'm not in the mood to get into the discussion seriously again, but suffice it to say that yes, JPEGs can be pushed and pulled in PP plenty for my taste, and that I have not seen a pro-RAW-PP photo example yet that was BOTH an example of a photo I would consider attractive AND showed adjustments that were not at least significantly similar to adjustments one could easily make to a JPEG. One or the other, perhaps - but never both.

It's far more effective to try to take good photos to begin with than beat this dead horse over and over again.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow