This shot is what convinced me to shoot in RAW (RX10)

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
aaanouel
Senior MemberPosts: 5,066Gear list
Like?
Re: JPGs are better than most suppose...
In reply to SanPedro, 5 months ago

SanPedro wrote

File sizes are not THAT much different if you go for superfine... from my experience

My RAW files are 19.4Mb
JPEgs are 11-16.8Mb in superfine.

Right, there's no big difference if using super fine JPGs, but my A65 produces 24Mp images at 24Mb files if RAW and 6 to 10Mb if JPG (just fine) only, so for me there's a big difference when saving a big series of photos.

And just to note that you can recover more from an under exposed shot than you can from an over exposed shot. If the pixels are pure white there ain't a lot you can do.

That's correct Peter.

-- hide signature --

aaanouel
Truth is a pathless land.
The dead past darkens the ever living present.
Corrections and critics are more than very welcome, desirables.

 aaanouel's gear list:aaanouel's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P73 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX100V Sony SLT-A65 Sony DT 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 Adobe Photoshop CS6 +21 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow