This shot is what convinced me to shoot in RAW (RX10)

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
nannyg
Regular MemberPosts: 234
Like?
Re: JPGs are better than most suppose...
In reply to aaanouel, 6 months ago

aaanouel wrote:

RAW files are great because of having lots of info for processing and recovering, OK!, but beyond RAW lovers imagination, you can also do great jobs from JPGs, in fact I shot RAWs only in very special occasions.

Original JPEG

Processed JPEG

I'd probably get better results shooting in RAW but this is just enough for me and saving A LOT of memory space in my hard disks.

-- hide signature --

aaanouel
Truth is a pathless land.
The dead past darkens the ever living present.
Corrections and critics are more than very welcome, desirables.

You must be using some sort of trickery there. Everyone knows only people taking "snapshots" ever shoot in JPEG because only RAW has sliders and only RAW can be adjusted, and RAW is like a photo negative that never changes, so that when technology changes, you can go back and spend more hours messing with them, which you can't do with JPEG, because it's "cooked", like bacon, and can never go back to the original, which was never really altered in the first place, because you can't really PP a JPEG, and why would you want to anyway, since it obviously wasn't worth taking in RAW, so it wasn't an important photo, like the one the OP shows, which is destined for Life Magazine, I think...

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow