PIX 2015

X-Trans advantages - fact or fiction ?

Started Feb 21, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
tesilab
Senior MemberPosts: 2,022Gear list
Like?
Re: X-Trans advantages - fact or fiction ?
In reply to nick_webster, Feb 21, 2014

It is very difficult to do a controlled test. Did you use the same lens/aperture/exposure on both cameras of the same subject at the same distance/lighting?

Using the same lens would require adapters, and that would also call all but center of the image in question, provided they were both carefully focused.

Then the next issue is that there is no truly neutral rendering with no sharpening, no noise reduction, etc. the specifics of the demosaicing algorithms influence this whether it's Bayer or Xtrans.

Color profiles and tone curves may also play a role in perceived sharpness, I guess.

The bottom line is that even with controlled parameters, you are still stuck with tweaking the output from each image to see what is the best that you can get from each, which is subjective. It's no wonder that reviewers throw in comparisons of default jpegs.

Have you wondered why DXO doesn't test Xtrans sensors or lenses with XTrans? This might explain it:

 tesilab's gear list:tesilab's gear list
Sony RX1 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Carl Zeiss Makro-Planar T* 2/100 Sony E 50mm F1.8 OSS Sigma 19mm F2.8 EX DN +11 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow