"But at low ISO nothing can beat this camera." - CEO SIGMA

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
Reilly Diefenbach
Senior MemberPosts: 8,393Gear list
Like?
At low or high ISO, there are quite a few.
In reply to Basalite, 10 months ago

This is a nice enough shot, but any 24MP camera has a good bit more detail at 6000X4000. The bar has been raised considerably over the last year or so.  Your jpg is 4704 × 3136 pixels, which is by definition lower resolution.   Digital is as cut and dried as it gets.  Want more than 6000X4000?  You'll need a 36MP or higher camera.  There is as well a lot of grainy noise, some of which has to be down to oversharpening.  It looks more like ISO 1600 on an APSC camera.  In any event, it is not what I would call a relaxed presentation of fine detail.  There are maybe 18 or 20 "perceptual" MP worth of apparent "sharpness" owing to the high degree of microcontrast, which is standing in for actual resolution.

I can certainly understand the appeal of a fairly high res camera in such a compact package, but how limited do we really want to be for ISO, lens selection and overall camera performance?

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
110New
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow