"But at low ISO nothing can beat this camera." - CEO SIGMA

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
unknown member
(unknown member)
Like?
Re: what I've learned from this thread
In reply to Scott Eaton, 5 months ago

Scott Eaton wrote:

-Because Sigma based cameras excel at low ISO shooting people that desire higher ISO shooting are teenagers and consumers.

Most young photographers seem to not realize that low ISO was the norm not too long ago.

-Only Sigma users appreciate image quality.

They are buying the cameras.

-If I own a Sigma camera I need to be neurotically obsessed with the bayer interpolation of other cameras.

No, just knowledgeable of how such things work.

- Only Sigma based images interpolate to higher DPI levels.

Current Sigma cameras don't interpolate at all. That's what Bayer sensor cameras do.

- When I post image galleries taken with a Sigma based camera it is mandatory I declare they were taken with a Sigma.

News to me. I own three current Sigma cameras and I never even post my images.

- Because film emulsions only delivered high quality images with low ISOs (or larger formats) then it's logical to conclude that higher ISO shooting is for teenagers and consumers.

It is mostly the younger photographers that are obsessed with high ISO.

I think the above nails it in a nutshell, and also manages to offend about 99% of commercial shooters and journalists who don't care about the relative abilities of their camera compared to others but use their system for the capabilities it allows them. Shooting bugs and flowers to show off the fact they aren't using a bayer based sensor isn't a priority.

Second, back in those film days low ISO color landscape photography was regarded as the most insipid, boring and cliche faction of visual imagery of any art medium. It was mocked then - it can be mocked now.

Nonsense, but If you don't like color landscape photography then the Sigmas excel at black and white.

As to why Sigma users seemed so obsessed with taking pictures of bugs and flowers kind of answers it's own question.

For you to know such things and create such a post, are you sure that it is you that is not "obsessed" with "Sigma users?

Frankly I'd like to see Sigma do something really radical and invent a sensor that uses more than 3 color filters, which any engineer versed in visual science knows creates a lot of problems with digital capture. Sigmas like any other RGB capture device interpolates a significant amount of color information because it can't discretely see a significant chunk of the visual spectrum but has to interpolate color like any bayer sensor.

Nonsense. At low ISO it sees all three colors just fine. Learn how the sensor works.

The difference is Sigma sensors -vs- bayer is their discrete sensor wells don't confuse that information with luminance data at the aquisition level. If Sigma were to do something like this, such as have a five or six aquisition filters they'd have every technical shooter on the planet lined up out the door. For now, you can keep the really sharp RGB images and insult other system owners that they are visually imparied. Just not worth it, as market share indicates.

Go design Sigmas next Foveon sensor if you have the answers.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
110New
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow