Panny 25mm 1.4 vs Olympus 25mm 1.8 Reviewed

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
mh2000
Senior MemberPosts: 2,683
Like?
Re: not subjective? give me a break!
In reply to Altruisto, 10 months ago

Altruisto wrote:

How can you say that this is not subjective? Give me a break!

When you are talking about a "sense of depth" you are talking a subjective perception!

Not only is there a DoF difference, there is also a rendering difference. These will cause different people to respond differently to each photo.

If you think you cannot consistently take the photos you want using the Oly 25, then don't buy it.

-- hide signature --

Who says that I'm discarding the Oly 25 or saying that it's not a good alternative? All I'm trying to say is that Robin Wong and all those claiming that there's no depth difference between the two lenses, are just not fair to the PL25.

-- hide signature --

http://www.flickr.com/photos/altruisto/
http://www.facebook.com/tarekmradrtci
https://twitter.com/#!/tarekmrad
owning a Nikon D600 with a Tamron 24-70 f2.8 VC, and a bunch of Nikon primes, a Nikon J1 but not particularly a Nikon fanboy, since I have an Olympus E-PL5, a Panasonic GX7, a Sony RX10 and a Canon S110 too!

DoF and "3D effect" and "sense of depth" are three very different things.

-- hide signature --
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
MIJNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow