X-T1 jpg quality question

Started 8 months ago | Questions thread
mbb101
Junior MemberPosts: 39
Like?
Re: X-T1 jpg quality question
In reply to Bill Robb, 8 months ago

Bill Robb wrote:

Graham Hill wrote:

Ed B wrote:

Graham Hill wrote:

This phenomena has been shown in great detail, over and over and over again. The X-E2 shows sledgehammer amounts of noise at higher ISO values which is dramatically destructive to skin.

You can continue to deny it exists, or do basic research here and find it for yourself. I dont even care about this issue and still have managed to see a half dozen examples in various threads here.

I'm not going to disagree with you but I've still not seen any good examples of this so if it has been shown "in detail, over and over again" I must have missed it.

Granted, it has been talked about in great detail.

There was a fantastic image shot by someone here who overlayed an X-E2 shot on top of an X-E1. The shot was of someone's hand and it showed clear as day the sledgehammer noise reduction that the X-E2 uses at very high ISO values.

So what you are saying is that the image quality is compromised a bit at the very end of the camera's ISO range?
I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked.

Maybe you could come up with something with the camera at a more reasonable ISO than 6400 and crab about that?

That just isn't correct I will happily shoot the X pro 1 up to iso 6400 in JPEG but I would only use the X 100S up to iso 1600 in JPEG as demonstrated above the smearing of detail is unacceptable at least to me it is. I have been a JPEG only shooter for 2 1/2 years but not now.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow