Why is FE 70-200 bigger and heavier than Canon's

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
EinsteinsGhost
Forum ProPosts: 11,059Gear list
Like?
Re: Why is FE 70-200 bigger and heavier than Canon's
In reply to hellocrowley, 7 months ago

pew pew wrote:

If the point of these cameras is small and portability, then why you want to add big lens on it, that kinda nullifies the camera purpose.

The point for me is not ultimate pocketability, but reduced weight and size while retaining high IQ. Is this not the goal of the NEX system? Leica shows what's possible with short flange distance. The Zeiss 35/2.8 is a good example too.

Leica lenses:
Do not have AF
Do not have Stabilization
Aren't light largely because of the way they are constructed.

And aren't speced at 70-200/4. If people used a7/7r only the way Leicas are, the size and weight will be down. But, these cameras offer flexibility because people demand telephoto zoom lenses as well.

 EinsteinsGhost's gear list:EinsteinsGhost's gear list
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F828 Sony SLT-A55 Sony Alpha NEX-6 Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Sony 135mm F2.8 (T4.5) STF +12 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow