Why is FE 70-200 bigger and heavier than Canon's

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
abortabort
Senior MemberPosts: 1,137Gear list
Like?
Re: Why is FE 70-200 bigger and heavier than Canon's
In reply to hellocrowley, 10 months ago

hellocrowley wrote:

pew pew wrote:

If the point of these cameras is small and portability, then why you want to add big lens on it, that kinda nullifies the camera purpose.

The point for me is not ultimate pocketability, but reduced weight and size while retaining high IQ. Is this not the goal of the NEX system? Leica shows what's possible with short flange distance. The Zeiss 35/2.8 is a good example too.

Care to point me to a Leica 70-200mm f4 Dual Drive AF with OSS for M-Mount? Or an AF one at all? Or a 70-200mm at all? A zoom maybe?

No point in comparing to a Leica in this instance.

 abortabort's gear list:abortabort's gear list
Sony RX100 Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D Nikon D700 Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Sony Alpha 7 +33 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow