Olympus faux-technical sounding names

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
Sean Nelson
Forum ProPosts: 10,153
Like?
Re: The letters are not the problem. It's the numbers.
In reply to RoelHendrickx, 6 months ago

RoelHendrickx wrote:

What would be logical is a numerical succession (higher number is newer edition), while e.g. keeping the numbers with one digit for the top range, two digit for the simplified range.

Nikon was on that path (D3, D70, D300) until they issued the D700 and D800 that trumps the double-digits.

At one point or another, all camera manufacturers seem to reach the end of logic in camera naming. One would wonder how and why they could not design a naming scheme and stick to it.

I like Panasonic's scheme best. "G" indicates their M43 camera line, the next letter indicates the tier or body style, and the number indicates the generation of the camera. It's dead simple, easy to understand, and leaves plenty of room for them to add new styles or tiers without messing up the relationship to existing cameras.  IMHO the only thing they've done wrong is to use the "GX" prefix for two quite different camera types.  Perhaps "X" means "experimental" in their mind.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow