How can A6000 beat PDAF, doenst make sense?

Started 7 months ago | Questions thread
captura
Forum ProPosts: 14,191Gear list
Like?
Re: How can A6000 beat PDAF, doenst make sense?
In reply to viking79, 7 months ago

viking79 wrote:

dpyy wrote:

How can A6000 beat PDAF? Can someone explain the technology behind this? It doesn't matter how many points of autofocus they put on the sensor it should still be significantly slower than dedicated sensors?

Even some dedicate CDAF cameras are faster than some PDAF cameras. There is no hard rule saying PDAF is better than CDAF.

Historically, CDAF has been slower as it takes video from the sensor, does some image processing on it, and determines where it is sharper. Better algorithms might take too much power or require more powerful processors to perform the calculations in real time (fast enough that the processor has some idle time).

Some huge limitations are how quickly you can read out data from the sensor, how quickly you can detect edges in that data, etc. Now with faster sensors that can refresh the video at say 120 times or 240 times a second instead of 30 times a second, lens motors designed to step through a range of values very rapidly and precisely, software calibrated to the lens that can analyze the image to see how defocused a lens is, etc, and CDAF has become very fast.

CDAF has some weak points, like low light means it has to integrate the video longer to get strong enough edges to detect, etc. So this quickly it can step through the focus range, etc.

Eric

It's the physics. It's much easier to get very fast CDAF with a quarter-sensor camera like an M43 Olympus or Panasonic.

 captura's gear list:captura's gear list
Fujifilm X10 Sony Alpha NEX-7 Samsung NX1000 NEX5R Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm 1:4-5.6 R +10 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow