DOF and Cropping take 2

Started Feb 11, 2014 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
moving_comfort
moving_comfort Veteran Member • Posts: 8,203
Re: So, your conclusion is that 'equivalency = false'?

awaldram wrote:

moving_comfort wrote:

.

Really? Can you show me where James showed how equivalence proved me wrong?I think he'd be as suprised to hear that he did that as me

(I think you're attributing some of what he was writing incorrectly, by the way - but I'll let him speak for himself.)

I've found the root of your point = Lumo Labs LoL

http://www.falklumo.com/lumolabs/articles/equivalence/

So now we know why you can't prove it as falconeye says

"Proof of equivalence

Now, I would have to proof my claim above. I don't do, it would just obfuscate my point."

So he admits he doesn't prove his thesis because to do so would confuse his point.

i.e to do so would prove it wrong and at a guess he already has done but didn't like the answer preferring fallacy over fact.

As they say there’s one born every minute

.

So, if I read you right... you're saying everything Falk laid out in that paper is wrong?

I want to nail you down on that statement because I feel like you may claim you didn't make it later.

.

-- hide signature --

Here are a few of my favorite things...
---> http://www.flickr.com/photos/95095968@N00/sets/72157626171532197/

 moving_comfort's gear list:moving_comfort's gear list
Pentax K20D Nikon D800 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 35mm f/1.8G Nikon AF-S Nikkor 300mm f/4D ED-IF Nikon AF Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D +10 more
Post (hide subjects) Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow