DOF and Cropping take 2

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
awaldram
Forum ProPosts: 10,713Gear list
Like?
Re: So, your conclusion is that 'equivalency = false'?
In reply to moving_comfort, 6 months ago

moving_comfort wrote:

.

Really? Can you show me where James showed how equivalence proved me wrong?I think he'd be as suprised to hear that he did that as me

(I think you're attributing some of what he was writing incorrectly, by the way - but I'll let him speak for himself.)

I've found the root of your point = Lumo Labs LoL

http://www.falklumo.com/lumolabs/articles/equivalence/

So now we know why you can't prove it as falconeye says

"Proof of equivalence

Now, I would have to proof my claim above. I don't do, it would just obfuscate my point."

So he admits he doesn't prove his thesis because to do so would confuse his point.

i.e to do so would prove it wrong and at a guess he already has done but didn't like the answer preferring fallacy over fact.

As they say there’s one born every minute

I also like his reference to the luminous landscape article I referred to his conclusion it to complex !

.

-- hide signature --

Here are a few of my favorite things...
---> http://www.flickr.com/photos/95095968@N00/sets/72157626171532197/

 awaldram's gear list:awaldram's gear list
Pentax Q Pentax K-3 Pentax smc DA* 55mm F1.4 SDM Pentax smc DA* 16-50mm F2.8 ED AL (IF) SDM Pentax smc DA* 50-135mm F2.8 ED (IF) SDM +11 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow