Fujifilm X-T1 poor sample imagges

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
dobbs-rb
Regular MemberPosts: 396
Like?
Re: Fujifilm X-T1 poor sample imagges
In reply to Aethon, 7 months ago

Aethon wrote:

dobbs-rb wrote:

A first generation cell phone images are about as good Fujifilm X-T1.

This may not be the absolute bestway to get people on the forum to help you with your question.

probably not.

There are many, many threads on this if you want to go and find them. In brief, as I understand it, DPR uses Lightroom as its default RAW processor, which coincidentally does a terrible job on Fujifilm X-Series files. Other RAW processors produce files that are just as good as those from any other modern 16Mb sensor (some claim better, some worse - there's not much in it really).

point taken. my only issue is the sample images are bad. judge judy wrote a book about peeing down one's  back and trying to convince one it is raining

Assuming you're not trolling, you can go as deep into this question as you like if you search the forum for terms such as "ninja" and "iridient".

not interested in why publish bad sample images . only in the fact they do. why publish bad samples that a retarded child can recognise as being poor. why should a photo site publish  poor samples of a product they are trying to sell.

cheers ray

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow