What the imager has

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
unknown member
(unknown member)
Like?
Many thanks for going to all the trouble
In reply to DickLyon, 7 months ago

DickLyon wrote:

Laurence Matson wrote:

As with all previous Foveon imagers there are layers where colors are detected. The "filtering" done in the silicon and the filtering process is really just counting electrons at each discrete location. The electrons are the "corpses" from the expired photons. Since photons carry energy in proportion to their frequency, the stronger ones will penetrate furthest and the weaker one will penetrate least. So the "blue" layer is merely a device to count how many dead photon bodies are lying around; the same goes for the "red" layer and the "green" layer.

Yes, this is a simple explanations. Perhaps some engineers can parse it better. I just studied acting.

Laurence,

Checking dpreview after hearing the news, I was amused to see that not much has changed in recent years.

Your Shakespearean description is not bad. The collected electrons are exactly the corpses of absorbed photons, which is the point that most people who talk about the filtering miss: absorption and filtering and detection being the same event.

But the "stronger" and "weaker" is not quite right. The high-frequency blue photons are stronger (highest energy); but the way they interact with silicon makes them get absorbed soonest, near the surface. The lowest energy photons, in the infrared, penetrate deep. Low frequencies, at wavelengths greater than 1100 nm, where the photons are quite weak, are not able to kick electrons out of the silicon lattice at all, so the silicon is completely transparent to them. In between, there's a nicely graded rate of absorption.

Understanding the spectral responses of the layers starts with understanding that at any wavelength, the light intensity decreases exponentially with depth in the silicon. I think I've written about this some place... Anyway, the top layer is not white, not luminance, not blue, but a sort of panchromatic blueish that turns out to work well enough for getting a high-frequency luminance signal. We did a lot of experiments and amazed ourselves how "well enough" the 1:1:4 worked; it was not obviously going to be a good thing, but turned out awesome.

We had 1:1:4 sensors working, including very efficient and effective hardware and software processing pipelines, before I left Foveon back in '06, but the sensors didn't yet have the low-noise fully-depleted top-layer photodiodes of the "Merrill" cameras, and we were only targeting these for cell phones at the time. I expect it will be a killer combination: fully-depleted blue plus 1:1:4. I don't think the red and green are fully depleted, too; that was thought to be somewhere between hard and impossible, which is why they don't have the same low read noise, and one reason why aggregating red and green quads this way is a big win.

But understanding how it compares to the classic Foveon and to Bayer will keep many people busy for a long time. Something for dpreviewers to do while waiting for cameras, and something to keep the marketing people tied up... Should be fun.

Dick

and joining DPR and finally giving reliable insight about what's really going on with the Quattro, Mr Lyon!

Awesome, I believe, might be the appropriate word for this

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow