APSC vs FF

Started 10 months ago | Questions thread
kartikjayaraman
Contributing MemberPosts: 557Gear list
Like?
Re: that's the entire issue
In reply to tko, 10 months ago

tko wrote:

Of course FF has lower noise and higher ISO, no one disagrees. But if the lenses are slower (F4 versus F2.8) the net result is similar.

This isn't limited to Sony. Canon and Nikon FF lenses are, especially for midrange-zooms, slower than their APC equivalents, leaving you wondering what the big advantage is.

Ah, but when you shoot primes, FF turns into a wonderland. A nice F1.4 prime on FF is a wonder.

Yes I was comparing ISO all other variables being the same.

There is the FE55 f/1.8. Not sure if 1.8 vs 1.4 would be that much of a difference. The f/1.8should be as much a wonderland too IMO. And of course you can always shoot in APS-C mode with the same lens in reduced resolution in a FF but not vice versa.

-- hide signature --
 kartikjayaraman's gear list:kartikjayaraman's gear list
Sony Alpha 7 Sony FE 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 OSS
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow