MFT Users: Do you miss the shallower depth-of-field of bigger sensor cameras?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
Dave Sanders
Contributing MemberPosts: 862Gear list
Like?
Always a little confused...
In reply to Great Bustard, 7 months ago

Great Bustard wrote:

...by the persistence of these debates. I'm sure you're sick of explaining this over and overĀ 

Well, the 5D has a significantly less efficient sensor than the GM1. However, if you do as you describe with the 6D, you'll find that the 6D has less noise, which is one of the primary reasons people choose a larger format. If you compared to a Sony A7R, you'd find not only less noise but significantly more detail -- another reason many choose a larger format.

Significantly? No. More? Yes. I shoot an RX1 and an E-M1 side-by-side all the time and the difference in noise is noticeable...especially long exposures. That 24mp Sony is a beast over a minute, no LENR required. Resolution? Less than I would have thought.

So when you say "the only difference" is DOF, well, if you're comparing a FF camera from over 8 years ago to an mFT camera from now...

Certainly there are other differences. Noise, resolution. How much does that matter any more? That's the question now as I think we long ago passed sufficiency in most formats. However, these DOF debates are a bit tiring...horses for courses. I currently have FF, DX and m4/3 in my arsenal.

-- hide signature --

Dave Sanders

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
NopeNew
Yes.New
Hmm.New
YesNew
YesNew
NoNew
YesNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow