Thom on Nikon's unanswered questions...

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
Tony Beach
Senior MemberPosts: 4,810
Like?
Re: Thom on Nikon's unanswered questions...
In reply to jfriend00, 7 months ago

jfriend00 wrote:

 Further, the rise of really good Sigma lenses with switchable mounts reduces the lock-in component in the future.

I didn't realize I could switch the mount on my Sigma lenses.

Here's a simple example. A D7100 with a buffer size of 20 images still wouldn't be a full D300 replacement (for other reasons), but it would at least be a great value at its price point that didn't feel so artificially crippled. You'd feel like you were getting amazing value for the price. As it is now, it's so obviously crippled that it just doesn't generate the same impact or loyalty or brand goodness that it could. It serves the needs of some, but misses the chance it had to show the product/brand leadership that earlier products did.

Maybe Nikon gets that leadership back with the D7200 -- the bar is a bit low so that shouldn't be so hard -- that's what Thom thinks might happen, but that remains to be seen.  The more problematic part is that even if the D7200 (or D400, or D9000, or whatever Nikon calls the D300s successor) is absolutely everything we want in some ways, Nikon will probably make enough of it incompatible with say a D800 to make it difficult to alternate between using them quickly and seamlessly.  It seems that Nikon has created a lot of seams in their camera system now.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow