Direct comparison Oly 12-40mmF2.8 with Oly 12-50mmF3.5-6.3?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
RoelHendrickx
Forum ProPosts: 22,362
Like?
That sounds really promising
In reply to jbenayas, 7 months ago

jbenayas wrote:

Your link gives this result:

"La página que estabas buscando en este blog no existe."

I definitely understand enough spanish to read that!

EDIT:

OK, I found the review, but through the main page of your blog.

You may still want to correct that link.

If I read correctly, you value the lens at 5/5 for IQ and 4/5 for value.

But I also read that you wanted to know whether it would be a replacement of your 12-60 (FT, I presume). Now that is a tall order. What was your conclusion there (I think I must have missed it in the text).

Thanks for warning me about the link. This is the good one:

http://blog.jorgebenayas.com/2013/11/prueba-mzuiko-ed-12-40-mm-f28.html

After almost three months using the lens, I think the 12-40 is the best replacement for my beloved 12-60, and in my opnion it is also a bit better: it gives no-compromise quality from f/2.8 to f/8 across the frame at all focal lenghts. And if I miss the 60mm focal lenght, I use my m.zuiko 60mm macro 2.8 .

I think that the 60mm macro is also very good, but getting it would be really overkill for me.

I'm not much into macro and I have a few good sharp lenses.

But the idea of a lens that could take over the role of my take-anywhere do-anything 12-60 workhorse is mighty appealing.

-- hide signature --

Roel Hendrickx
lots of images: www.roelh.zenfolio.com
my E-3 user field report from Tunisian Sahara: http://www.biofos.com/ukpsg/roel.html

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow