Direct comparison Oly 12-40mmF2.8 with Oly 12-50mmF3.5-6.3?

Started 8 months ago | Discussions thread
Paul De Bra
Forum ProPosts: 11,340Gear list
Like?
It's clear in the pictures by Martin, but not dramatic.
In reply to RoelHendrickx, 8 months ago

I wear glasses with varifocal lenses. A common problem with such glasses is that you have to find a spot on the glasses to look through to get sharp vision, depending on the distance to the subject. With the first 12-40 image I can find a spot where the image is crisp but with the first 12-50 image it is as if there is something wrong with my glasses as I cannot find any spot to look through so that the image becomes crisp.

It isn't dramatic as you can clear up such "fog" by means of added contrast and sharpening. I think that if these images were shot in RAW, the CA corrected and a bit more contrast and sharpening applied to the 12-50 image the pair would become much harder to distinguish. So the 12-50 is by no means bad but the 12-40 is clearly better. Images that require less processing end up looking better upon close inspection. But if CA were corrected and contrast for the 12-50 increased a bit then the images would look the same when viewed on a large computer monitor. Such monitor has a resolution of 2MP (soon going up to 4MP) and that is enough of a downscaling to make the differences disappear.

-- hide signature --

Slowly learning to use the Olympus OM-D E-M5.
Public pictures at http://debra.zenfolio.com/.

 Paul De Bra's gear list:Paul De Bra's gear list
Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR Olympus OM-D E-M5 Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm 1:4.0-5.6 Panasonic Lumix G 20mm F1.7 ASPH Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 75-300mm 1:4.8-6.7 +4 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow