EM-5 Low ISO, there is a RAW difference

Started 5 months ago | Discussions thread
TorsteinH
Contributing MemberPosts: 965Gear list
Like?
Re: See this discussion for more details
In reply to texinwien, 5 months ago

texinwien wrote:

TorsteinH wrote:

There is a RAW difference between ISO 200 and low ISO on the E-M5. At least according to this website http://www.guillermoluijk.com/article/em5isolow/ According to his measurement the RAW file is at ISO 160 whatever that means both theoretically and practically. I would expect a tiny bit cleaner black and the same headroom as ISO 200 if you "underexpose" by 2/3 f/stop.

-- hide signature --

www.ohb.no/foto
Torstein

In short, it seems that LOW ISO on the E-M5 is like ISO 250 underexposed by one stop.

How do you draw that conclusion?

If the RAW is different at camera ISO 200 and camera ISO Low (measured to ISO 160), I would guess that ISO 250 is equal to ISO 200 (If there is no difference at RAW files  between ISO 200 and ISO 250 underexposed 1/3 f/stop).

-- hide signature --

www.ohb.no/foto
Torstein

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow