So much for the EVF being insufficient for action.....

Started 11 months ago | Discussions thread
Lee Jay
Forum ProPosts: 45,317Gear list
Like?
Re: Is the claim even true?
In reply to crashpc, 11 months ago

crashpc wrote:

Lee Jay wrote:

Nigel Wilkins wrote:

It's still 0.005s between capture & display, you just don't get a refresh every 0.005s.

The lag that matters is that between photons entering the lens and leaving the EVF.

Of course, but 0.005s lag makes 200FPS.

If there's no pipeline latency.

This needs to be achieved even in poor light. So it´s under 1/200s for each frame. How will you solve this for dark situations, when you often need 10s for proper exposure? ISO 200 000+? Well, not my cup of tea for 4/3" or APS-C.

Yes...ISOs in the half-million and up range.

Or, in my case, I'll just continue to use my OVFs.

-- hide signature --

Lee Jay

 Lee Jay's gear list:Lee Jay's gear list
Canon IXUS 310 HS Canon PowerShot SX260 HS Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 20D Canon EOS 550D +23 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
NONew
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
(unknown member)
YesNew
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow