MFT I don't get it . . .

Started 11 months ago | Discussions thread
letsgofishing
Regular MemberPosts: 219Gear list
Like?
Re: MFT I don't get it . . .
In reply to Tom Axford, 11 months ago

Tom Axford wrote:

VertigonA380 wrote:

Sure I understand the ratio, but why didn't they just make it 1:1? I mean the converging lens would create the same image projection on the sensor, so why make it 4:3 and lose out? Or am I missing something technical in between?

Are you referring to the 'four thirds' in the name Micro Four Thirds?

If so, this has nothing to do with the aspect ratio of the images. It would be perfectly possible to make an MFT camera using 1:1 or 3:2 or 16:9 or any other ratio.

The four thirds in MFT refers to the sensor size, which is four thirds inches (i.e. 1.33 inches) using a very old way of specifying the size of sensors in television cameras by giving the size of the tube in which the sensor was located. The actual sensor diameter is about 0.8" in MFT cameras.

...maybe - it is laso the actual physical aspect ratio of the sensor - 17.3x13mm = 4:3.....

 letsgofishing's gear list:letsgofishing's gear list
Olympus OM-D E-M5 Sigma 60mm F2.8 DN | Art Rokinon 7.5mm 1:3.5 UMC Fisheye CS Olympus 12-40mm F2.8
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow