Irrational views on SLT part duex

Started 9 months ago | Discussions thread
Senior MemberPosts: 3,077Gear list
Re: Other Reading, ISO-Less
In reply to William Curtindale, 9 months ago

William Curtindale wrote:

Oh my gosh, I have been left out in the woods on this one. In the past I have briefly read post by Nordstjermen on the subject but did not think too much about it (my loss).

After reading and seeing all the push back, consternation and frustration in this thread I went out and googled "ISO-Less Sensor". Oh my gosh, this is real and I should understand it (how I use it is another thing).

It is obvious there are some very knowledgeable members in this forum (so Thanks for the lessons and enlightening on the subject - many of us can learn from this).

Below are three links I found to be interesting (the 3rd article bothers me a little because of how the author defines exposure relative to ISO-Less sensor) :




Finally, I think I now understand. I have an ISO-Less camera.

Thanks Nordstjermen

-- hide signature --

A99, A900, A700, R1 w/Zeiss + Sony G Glass

This doesn't directly relate to my reply but thanks for posting. I knew that stuff anyway in a crude sense. We experimented with this kind of stuff at university.

Was a nice refresher

 nandbytes's gear list:nandbytes's gear list
Sony Alpha 7 Sony a77 II Sony DT 16-80mm F3.5-4.5 ZA Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* Samyang 14mm F2.8 IF ED MC Aspherical Sony FE 35mm F2.8 +1 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow