Irrational views on SLT part duex

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
Shield3
Senior MemberPosts: 2,440Gear list
Like?
Re: I wish you would read first.
In reply to TrojMacReady, 10 months ago

If it were truly "ISO-less" then the results shouldn't change based on exposure time. It's not. That's why on all cameras you see the dynamic range and shadow noise go to pot at high ISO's.

You'll never get me to think otherwise. I do appreciate you continuing to say "not sure if you're trolling" to somehow add credibility to your claim though. Bonus points.

A properly exposed ISO6400 shot then shot at ISO 100 would certainly mean the 100 shot is going to get blown out.

But, again, if they were truly ISO-less one should be able to do what I've done in this thread and the shots be very similar.  Why aren't they?

 Shield3's gear list:Shield3's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM +2 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow