What a bias A7/r review using third party lens!

Started 10 months ago | Discussions thread
Erik Magnuson
Forum ProPosts: 12,083Gear list
Like?
Re: What a bias A7/r review using third party lens!
In reply to quezra, 10 months ago

quezra wrote:

It might be marginally softer than my FL55/1.2 which I absolutely adore ... what Barney clearly doesn't have a clue about though is that these lenses were rarely made to be shot at max aperture ... wide open apertures were used as focusing aids in darkness but were expected to be stopped down prior to snapping.

Since the fastest normal lenses were for rangefinders (e.g. Canon 50mm f/0.95), this argument is weak. Canon may have introduced it's 55/1.2 for brighter focusing on the Pellix, but it did not matter as much for most cameras.

He could have shot a Konica AR 40/1.8 and found it soft at f1.8 too. You'll notice the next stop on that lens is miles away at f2.8 - the actual aperture most people were expected to actually use.

No, Konica just cheaped out by putting in only full clickstops. The 1/3 stop difference between f/1.8 and 2.0 was too small for an accurate clickstop.  Since all Konica bodies at the time of the 40mm had shutter-priority auto (where the lens could be more easily controlled to intermediate values), aperture ring half-stops were not considered critical.

-- hide signature --

Erik

 Erik Magnuson's gear list:Erik Magnuson's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark II Canon EOS 450D Sigma SD10 Sony Alpha NEX-5 Nikon D3200 +28 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
HmmmNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow