whats up with my FZ200 images

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
Steen Bay
Veteran MemberPosts: 6,188
Like?
Re: It's the small aperture
In reply to sherman_levine, 6 months ago

sherman_levine wrote:

cmc1 wrote:

sherman_levine wrote:

cmc1 wrote:

Just to confirm both of the submitted images were shot in RAW and converted to JPEG via LR4.4 export.

How large were the LR JPG exports? I wonder if you've created the JPGs at low quality.

(or, and I suppose a better question is, did the images look this bad in LR)

For reference, the "high quality" JPGs created by FZ200 are about 5mb each.

Also, did you have image stabilization on or off?

Sherm

Images were exported at full quality (100) and the image stabilisation was on.

I'll try and post some more later if I get time

I took three sets of images at ISO 100, full W/A, A mode, on a tripod with self-timer. These are screenshots of 100% crops of the .RW2 viewed in Faststone.

Left to right:

#1 - f/2.8 with stabilization enabled

#2 - f/2.8 with stabilization disabled

#3 - f/8.0 with stabilization disabled

The f/8.0 image was much blurrier than either of the f/2.8 images. The stabilization seemed to do no harm.

Sherm

Quite a difference. Maybe not that surprising considering that the FZ200 at f/8 has the same DoF and diffraction as a 12mp FF camera has at f/45 (wish that my SX50 was a bit faster than f/6.5 at the long end).

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow