Are Full Frame SLRs Obsolete?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
joema1
Regular MemberPosts: 360Gear list
Like?
Re: Are Full Frame SLRs Obsolete?
In reply to RS_RS, 7 months ago

RS_RS wrote:

...The mirror and prism are a different matter. It is an inherently clumsy system that has been refined to become workable, a bit like the steam railway engine, and any such system is vulnerable to replacement when something better comes along.

A more accurate analogy might be an automotive piston engine. They are inherently clumsy, have many moving parts, and create lots of vibration. However they are extremely refined, building on a century of R&D and manufacturing advances. There are other engine designs which have far fewer parts, produce less vibration, and theoretically should be cheaper to manufacture. But they must overcome the huge lead in development refinement of piston engines, and the economies of scale in manufacturing them.

Also while full-frame mirrorless cameras are being further developed, full-frame DSLRs will not be standing still. It's true refinement of electro-mechanical aspects of DSLR development are more constrained than non-mechanical mirrorless equivalents. However the purely electronic (sensor, CPU, algorithms, autofocus) aspects of DSLRs are not constrained and will continue to progress. So the mirrorless full-frame competitors face a moving target.

 joema1's gear list:joema1's gear list
Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 USM Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM +3 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
TrueNew
SureNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow